Discovery Phase

planek
planek
planek
planek
planek
planek
planek
planek
planek
planek
planek
planek
planek
planek
planek
planek

    ROM estimation
    A quick viability check to support a go/no-go decision. You’ll get a clear view of feasibility, a directional sense of the scope, and an idea of the budget, without going deep or over-investing too early.
    $
    1,500
    Best Value
    Ballpark estimation
    A high-level estimate that outlines major components, assumptions, and risks to help you make informed technical and business decisions, and move into development with a well-defined understanding of what will be built and how.
    $
    5,000
    Detailed estimation
    A fully validated, execution-ready estimate with a budget we commit to. It delivers precise effort per feature, backed by detailed requirements, design, and architecture. Typically starts at $10,000+
    $
    Custom

    Product Requirements Document (PRD)

    A PRD (Product Requirements Document) is a clear, structured description of what a product must do, for whom, and why. In the discovery stage, it aligns business goals, user needs, and technical constraints into a single source of truth. It prevents teams from building the wrong thing by forcing assumptions, scope, and success criteria to be made explicit early. For engineering and delivery, it reduces rework, scope creep, and miscommunication with stakeholders.

    Without a PRD, discovery becomes guesswork instead of a controlled, testable decision-making process.

    Input

    Output

    All existing artefacts and documents from the client:

    • descriptions
    • designs or prototypes
    • references and notes
    • charts and videos

    High-level document defining what the system should do from the user's perspective. It includes:​
    • Product objectives and goals
    • Target audience and user personas
    • High-level user flows (Detailed User Journey Maps are an optional activity)
    • High-level feature list with priorities
    • Assumptions and constraints
    • Out-of-scope items (negative scope)
    • Release strategy overview (timeline of SDLC for this specific project)

    2-4 Requirement Elicitation Sessions (up to two hours in total for the simplest project, considering there are other documents for review)

    Vision and Scope document. Establishes a HIGH-LEVEL product vision. It includes:
    • business goals
    • key features
    • project scope
    • market opportunities
    • glossary of terms

    High-Level Requirements List (includes MVP Scope Definition)

    A High-Level Requirements List defines the core capabilities of the product and clearly outlines the MVP scope. It aligns stakeholders on boundaries, preventing overengineering and uncontrolled scope expansion. For the team, it enables rough estimation and sequencing decisions.

    Without it, MVP discussions stay abstract and delivery risk increases due to unclear priorities.

    Input

    Output

    Product Requirements Document (PRD)

    Structured compilation of functional requirements defining what the system must do, including:​
    • business processes
    • administrative functions
    • authentication needs
    • reporting requirements (how the team reports to the client and other org questions)
    • Auth / Permissions
    • RBAC (simplified model for 1-3 roles). Detailed RBAC should be a separate activity for systems with more roles or a complex permissions schema.

    2-4 additional Requirement Elicitation Sessions might be required for more complex projects

    MVP Scope
    • Finalized list of core features included in MVP
    • Features categorized as Must-Have / Should-Have / Could-Have / Won’t-Have-Now

    User Stories

    User Stories describe product requirements from the end-user’s perspective, focusing on value rather than implementation. In the discovery stage, they help validate real user needs and expose gaps in assumptions. They translate high-level requirements into actionable, testable units of work. User Stories also support prioritization by linking features directly to user outcomes.

    Without them, teams risk building technically correct solutions that fail to solve real user problems.

    Input

    Output

    Product Requirements Document (PRD)

    Detailed user stories following the standard format: "As a [user type] I want to [goal] So that [reason]". Each story includes:
    • Acceptance criteria
    • Priority rankings
    • Effort estimates (T-shirt size or Story points)
    • Dependencies and relationships

    High-Level Requirements List

    End-to-end workflow understanding, showing user interactions with the system at various touchpoints. Basic flows, alternative flows, and exception handling scenarios

    Design it right first

    Interactive Prototype

    An Interactive Prototype is a clickable representation of the product’s core user flows. In the discovery stage, it allows stakeholders and users to validate ideas before any code is written. It quickly exposes usability issues, missing flows, and incorrect assumptions. For the team, it creates a shared understanding of behavior, not just features.

    Without an interactive prototype, feedback comes later, when changes are far more expensive.

    Input

    Output

    We will need the following:

    • Product Requirements Document (PRD)
    • High-Level Requirements List
    • User Stories

    Clickable, functional demonstrations of the product, allowing stakeholders to experience user flows before development. They enable:​
    • Early usability testing
    • Validation of interaction patterns
    • Stakeholder demonstrations
    • Early identification of UX issues
    • Reduced development rework
    • Technical feasibility assessment

    Technical Architecture Document

    A Technical Architecture Document defines how the system will be built and how its components interact. In the discovery stage, it validates technical feasibility, scalability, and key trade-offs early. It aligns business requirements with concrete technology, infrastructure, and integration decisions. For the team, it reduces delivery risk by clarifying structure, security, and future extensibility before implementation.

    Without it, teams make architectural decisions reactively, leading to rework and long-term technical debt.

    Input

    Output

    We will need the following:

    • Product Requirements Document (PRD)
    • High-Level Requirements List
    • User Stories
    • Interactive Prototype
    • Approved list of 3rd-party integrations
    • Entity Relationship Diagram (ERD)

    Comprehensive specification of the system architecture. It includes:​
    • System architecture diagrams (C4) showing component interactions
    • Technology stack recommendations (programming languages, frameworks, databases)
    • Integration points with third-party systems
    • Infrastructure requirements and cloud provider selection
    • Modular back-end structure
    • Microservices/modules plan
    • Security architecture and authentication mechanisms

    Feasibility Assessment

    A Feasibility Assessment evaluates whether the product can realistically be built as envisioned. During discovery, it validates the technical approach and exposes constraints, dependencies, and external risks early. It reduces uncertainty around third-party integrations by assessing APIs, limits, and failure points. For stakeholders, it provides risk visibility along with concrete mitigation and contingency plans.

    Without a feasibility assessment, teams commit to timelines and scopes based on assumptions rather than evidence.

    Input

    Output

    Product Requirements Document (PRD)

    Validation of the technical approach and idea viability

    Access to 3rd party service providers (documentation, accounts)

    Identified external risks with the management plan and the mitigation plan

    Integration requirements

    API integration analysis, which includes:
    • SDK availability check
    • Definition of all webhooks and payloads
    • Evaluation of restrictions (rate limits, quotas)
    • List of webhooks and events
    • Risks of each integration
    • Preparation of questions for service support (if necessary)
    • Integrations POC (if necessary)
    • 3rd-party providers selection guidance (if needed)

    No guesswork. Just evidence.

    Entity Relationship Diagram (ERD)

    An Entity Relationship Diagram (ERD) defines the system’s data model by mapping entities, attributes, and their relationships. In the discovery stage, it validates how business requirements translate into a scalable and consistent data structure. It ensures alignment between product logic, integrations, and database design. For data-heavy systems, it highlights data volume, migration needs, and long-term maintainability concerns.

    Without an ERD, data assumptions remain implicit, leading to schema rework, integration issues, and data inconsistencies later in development.

    Input

    Output

    We will need the following:

    • Product Requirements Document (PRD)
    • High-Level Requirements List
    • User Stories

    Entity relationship diagrams and data model structure. Data architecture document showing entities, their attributes, and relationships. It shows how the database structure aligns with business requirements and provides a foundation for the development team For data-heavy projects, it might additionally include data flow schema, data volume analysis, and migration strategy

    Low-fidelity design

    Low-fidelity design represents the product’s structure and flows using simple wireframes or sketches. In the discovery stage, it helps validate layout, navigation, and user logic without investing in visual polish. It encourages fast feedback and iteration by keeping discussions focused on functionality, not aesthetics. For the team, it clarifies scope and reduces misunderstandings before detailed design begins.

    Without low-fidelity design, usability issues surface late, when changes are costlier to fix.

    High-fidelity design

    High-fidelity design is a detailed, visually polished representation of the final user interface and interactions. In the discovery stage, it validates usability, branding, and user expectations before development starts. It removes ambiguity by specifying exact layouts, behaviors, and visual standards. For the team, it enables accurate estimation and faster implementation with fewer design-related questions.

    Without high-fidelity design, teams risk misaligned expectations and costly UI rework during development.

    FAQ

    Everything you need to know about the discovery phase for your software development project.

    What is a discovery phase?

    A discovery phase is a short (1-4 weeks), focused process where we turn a high-level idea into a clear, buildable plan. We define the MVP scope, user flows, core features, and technical approach before any real development starts. The outcome is clarity on what will be built, how, and in what order.

    Why is a discovery phase essential?

    Around 70% of software projects run into delays or cost overruns due to unclear or changing requirements. Discovery surfaces the critical 10–20 decisions that shape 80% of delivery outcomes: scope boundaries, assumptions, risks, and trade-offs. Making these decisions early dramatically reduces uncertainty once development starts.

    How does discovery save resources?

    Teams that skip discovery typically spend 20–40% more time and budget on rework, scope changes, and fixing wrong assumptions. A proper discovery phase improves estimate accuracy by 2–3×, shortens development cycles, and reduces overall product development cost by avoiding low-value or unnecessary features.

    Plan once. Build confidently.

    Testimonials

    Customer Reviews

      Let's help you!

      It's out pleasure to have a chance to cooperate.

      crm api integration
      python django hosting providers